The Tunisian police, military, and national guard including the coast guard have committed serious abuses against Black African migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers, Human Rights Watch said today. Documented abuses include beatings, use of excessive force, some cases of torture, arbitrary arrests and detention, collective expulsions, dangerous actions at sea, forced evictions, and theft of money and belongings.<\/p>\n
Yet on July 16, the European Union (EU) announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Tunisia on a new \u201cstrategic partnership\u201d and a funding package of up to \u20ac1 billion for the country, including \u20ac105 million for \u201cborder management, \u2026 search and rescue, anti-smuggling and return.\u201d Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte highlighted that the partnership would include focus on \u201cbolstering efforts to stop irregular migration.\u201d The MoU, which must be approved formally by EU member states, failed to include serious guarantees that Tunisian authorities would prevent violations of the rights of migrants and asylum seekers, and that EU financial or material support would not reach entities responsible for human rights violations.<\/p>\n
\u201cTunisian authorities have abused Black African foreigners, fueled racist and xenophobic attitudes, and forcibly returned people fleeing by boat who risk serious harm in Tunisia,\u201d said Lauren Seibert, refugee and migrant rights researcher at Human Rights Watch. \u201cBy funding security forces who commit abuses during migration control, the EU shares responsibility for the suffering of migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers in Tunisia.\u201d<\/p>\n
The EU has already dedicated at least \u20ac93-178 million in migration-related funding to Tunisia cumulatively between 2015 and 2022, including by reinforcing and equipping security forces to prevent irregular migration and stop boats heading for Europe. The EU should suspend funding to Tunisian security forces for migration control and set clear human rights benchmarks for any further support, Human Rights Watch said. EU member states should withhold their support for migration and border management under the recently signed MoU with Tunisia until a thorough human rights impact assessment is carried out.<\/p>\n
In addition to the documented security force abuses, Tunisian authorities have failed to ensure adequate protection, justice, or support for many victims of forced evictions and racist attacks, at times even blocking such efforts. As a result, with respect to Black Africans, Tunisia is neither a safe place for disembarkation of third country nationals intercepted or rescued at sea, nor a \u201csafe third country\u201d for transfers of asylum seekers.<\/p>\n
Since March, Human Rights Watch has conducted phone and in-person interviews with 24 people \u2013 22 men, 1 woman, and 1 girl \u2013 who lived in Tunisia, including 19 migrants, 4 asylum seekers, and 1 refugee, from Senegal, Mali, C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Cameroon, and Sudan. Nineteen had entered Tunisia between 2017 and 2022, twelve irregularly and seven regularly. For five interviewees, the dates and manner of entry were unknown. Some of those interviewed are not identified by name for their security or at their request.<\/p>\n
Human Rights Watch also interviewed four representatives from civil society groups in Tunisia \u2013 the Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights (FTDES), Lawyers Without Borders (ASF), EuroMed Rights, and Alarm Phone, a rescue hotline network \u2013 as well as a volunteer who assisted refugees in Tunis; Elizia Volkmann, a Tunis-based journalist; and Monica Marks, a university professor and Tunisia expert. All seven had interviewed or assisted dozens of migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees in Tunisia, and knew of or had documented cases of abuse by the police or coast guard.<\/p>\n
Among the migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees interviewed, nine had returned to their countries on emergency repatriation flights in March, while eight remained in Tunis, the Tunisian capital, or Sfax, a port city southeast of Tunis. Seven were among the up to 1,200 Black Africans expelled or forcibly transferred by Tunisian security forces to land borders with Libya and Algeria in early July 2023.<\/p>\n
Overall, 22 interviewees had suffered human rights violations at the hands of Tunisian authorities.<\/p>\n
Though the documented abuses took place between 2019 and 2023, the majority occurred after President Kais Saied in February 2023 ordered security forces to crack down on irregular migration, linking undocumented African migrants to crime and a \u201cconspiracy\u201d to change Tunisia\u2019s demographics. Saied\u2019s speech, which UN experts have called racist, was followed by a surge in hate speech, discrimination, and attacks.<\/p>\n
Fifteen people interviewed said they suffered violence by the police, military, or national guard including coast guard. This included a refugee and an asylum seeker beaten and electrically shocked by police during detention in Tunis. Five people said that authorities confiscated and never returned their money or belongings.<\/p>\n
The seven interviewees expelled to border zones in July said the military and national guard left them in the desert with insufficient food and water. While some were relocated back into Tunisia a week later by Tunisian authorities, others still needed assistance or were unaccounted for.<\/p>\n
At least nine people interviewed had been arbitrarily arrested and detained in Tunis, Ariana, and Sfax, where police profiled them based on their skin color. They said officers did not check their papers before arresting them, and in most cases neither conducted individual legal status assessments nor allowed them to challenge their arrest.<\/p>\n
A 31-year-old Malian interviewed had a valid residence permit when police arbitrarily arrested him in mid-2022 in Ariana. \u201cThey didn\u2019t ask me whether I had documents or not,\u201d he said. \u201cMy friend was arrested with me \u2026 a Guinean military officer who had come to Tunisia for medical treatment. He had a passport with a [valid] entry stamp.\u201d<\/p>\n
Five people recounted abuses during or after sea interceptions and rescues near Sfax, apparently by the maritime national guard, also referred to as the coast guard. These included beatings, theft, leaving a boat adrift without a motor, overturning a boat, and insulting and spitting on survivors.<\/p>\n
Three civil society group representatives interviewed also described increasingly problematic coast guard practices since 2022, including beatings, dangerous use of teargas, shooting in the air, taking or damaging boat engines and leaving people stranded at sea, creating waves that caused boats to capsize, delays in rescues, and theft of money and phones.<\/p>\n
Human Rights Watch wrote to the Tunisian Foreign Affairs and Interior Ministries on June 28, sharing research findings and posing questions, but received no response.<\/p>\n
In addition to the security force abuses, at least 12 men interviewed said they also experienced abuses by Tunisian civilians, including 10 assaulted or robbed and 5 forcibly evicted by civilian landlords. All but two incidents occurred after President Saied\u2019s February speech.<\/p>\n
In the months following Saied\u2019s speech, and in the context of Tunisia\u2019s deteriorating economic situation, worsening repression and xenophobic violence, and increasing boat departures and deaths at sea, over a dozen European officials visited Tunisia to discuss economic, security, and migration issues with Tunisian officials. The German interior minister noted the importance of \u201cthe human rights of refugees\u201d and \u201ccreat[ing] legal migration routes,\u201d but few others publicly mentioned human rights concerns. The French interior minister said France would offer Tunisia \u20ac25.8 million to help \u201ccontain the irregular flow of migrants.\u201d<\/p>\n
Millions in EU and bilateral funding \u2013 particularly from Italy \u2013 have already supported, equipped, and trained the Tunisian coast guard, \u201cinternal security forces,\u201d and \u201cland border management institutions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Border \u201cexternalization\u201d \u2013 preventing irregular arrivals by outsourcing migration controls to third countries \u2013 has become a central plank in the EU\u2019s response to mixed migration and has led to egregious human rights violations. Support to abusive security forces only exacerbates human rights abuses that drive migration.<\/p>\n
\u201cBoth the EU and the Tunisian government need to fundamentally reorient their approach to migration challenges,\u201d Seibert said. \u201cBorder control is no justification for trampling rights and ignoring international protection responsibilities.\u201d<\/p>\n
Migration and Refugee Context in Tunisia<\/p>\n
Tunisia is a country of origin, destination, and transit for migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers. In the first half of 2023, it has surpassed Libya as a departure point for boats arriving in Italy. According to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), of the 69,599 people who arrived in Italy between January and July 9 via Mediterranean Sea routes, 37,720 had departed from Tunisia, 28,558 from Libya, and others from Turkey and Algeria.<\/p>\n
The most common countries of origin for those arriving in Italy were, in descending order, C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire, Egypt, Guinea, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tunisia, Syria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, and Mali. Cameroon, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Guinea have faced widespread human rights abuses linked to conflict, coups, or government crackdowns in recent years.<\/p>\n
A 2021 official estimate said that 21,000 foreigners from non-Maghreb African countries were in Tunisia, whose population is 12 million. The country hosted 9,000 registered refugees and asylum seekers as of January. Tunisia is party to the UN and African refugee conventions, and its Constitution provides for the right to political asylum. However, Tunisia has no national asylum law or system. UNHCR carries out registration and refugee status determination.<\/p>\n
Though international human rights standards discourage the criminalization of irregular migration, Tunisian laws dating from 1968 and 2004 criminalize the irregular entry, stay, and exit of foreigners, as well as organizing or assisting illegal entry or exit. Penalties include prison and fines. Tunisia has no explicit legal grounds for administrative immigration detention, but multiple organizations have documented arbitrary detention of African migrants. Tunisia permits 90-day visa-free travel with an entry stamp for several African nationalities. However, obtaining a residency permit can be difficult.<\/p>\n
According to the nongovernmental group FTDES, between January and May 2023, Tunisian authorities arrested over 3,500 migrants for \u201cirregular stay\u201d and intercepted over 23,000 people attempting irregular departures from Tunisia. FTDES spokesperson Romdhane Ben Amor told Human Rights Watch that most recorded arrests of migrants took place near the Algeria border, though hundreds also occurred in Tunis, Sfax, and other cities following the president\u2019s speech.<\/p>\n
Collective Expulsion to Libya and Algeria Borders<\/p>\n
Between July 2 and 5, 2023, Tunisian police, national guard, and military conducted raids in and around Sfax, arbitrarily arresting hundreds of Black African foreigners of many nationalities with both regular and irregular legal status. Without due process, the national guard and military expelled or forcibly transferred up to 1,200 people in several groups to the Libyan and Algerian borders.<\/p>\n
The authorities drove an estimated 600-700 people south to the Libya border near the town of Ben Guerdane, according to five interviewees expelled there. They drove hundreds of others west to various locations along the Algerian border in the Tozeur, Gafsa, and Kasserine governorates, according to two expelled people, UN representatives, FTDES, and Alarm Phone.<\/p>\n
The hundreds expelled to a remote, militarized zone at the Tunisia-Libya border included at least 29 children and 3 pregnant women. At least six were UNHCR-registered asylum seekers. People interviewed said that national guard or military officers beat and abused them during expulsions, including a 16-year-old girl who said she was sexually assaulted. They said security officers threw away their food, smashed their phones, and left them in a zone from which they could neither enter Libya nor return to Tunisia, with security forces of both countries pushing them back. They provided their GPS location on July 2-4 and videos and photos of expelled people, their injuries, smashed phones, passports, and consular and asylum seeker cards.<\/p>\n
On July 7, Human Rights Watch interviewed two people expelled or forcibly transferred to or near the Algerian border on July 4 and 5. They were in two groups, totaling fifteen people, including seven women \u2013 two pregnant \u2013 and one child. They said they were transported from Sfax in buses, forced to walk in the desert without adequate food or water, and pushed back by both Algerian and Tunisian security forces. A Guinean woman asylum seeker shared her group\u2019s GPS location in Gafsa governorate, while an Ivorian man shared his group\u2019s location in Kasserine governorate. They also provided videos of their groups walking in the desert.<\/p>\n
In a July 8 statement, President Saied called allegations of abuses by security forces against migrants \u201clies\u201d and \u201cfake news.\u201d The weekend of July 8, Tunisian Red Crescent teams provided food, water, and medical aid to some migrants at or near the Algerian and Libyan borders. They were the only aid group Tunisian authorities allowed into the Libya border zone.<\/p>\n
On July 10, Tunisian authorities finally relocated more than 600 people from the Libya border to International Organization for Migration (IOM) shelters and other facilities in Ben Guerdane, Medenine, and Tataouine, according to UN representatives and an Ivorian man among those taken to Medenine, who provided his location. However, on July 11, Human Rights Watch spoke with two migrants saying they were in a group of over one hundred expelled people still stuck at the Libya border. They shared videos and their location.<\/p>\n
Migrants at both borders alleged to Human Rights Watch and others that several people had died or been killed following expulsion, though Human Rights Watch could not independently confirm their accounts. On July 11, Agence France-Presse reported that the bodies of two migrants were found in the desert near the Tunisia-Algeria border. Al Jazeera, who visited the Tunisia-Libya border area several times, published footage from July 11 showing two still-stranded groups of African migrants \u2013 over 150 people total \u2013 and the body of a migrant who had died.<\/p>\n
Tunisia is party to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination; to the African Charter on Human and Peoples\u2019 Rights, which prohibits collective expulsions; and to the UN and African Refugee Conventions, the Convention Against Torture, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibit forced returns or expulsions to countries where people could face torture, threats to their lives or freedom, or other serious harm.<\/p>\n
Police Abuses<\/p>\n
Outside of those expelled, eleven people interviewed experienced abuses by the police in Tunis, Sfax, Ariana, and a town near the Algerian border, including at least eight cases of violence. Two said that police forcibly evicted them from their apartments. Seven said police racially insulted them, including one threatened with death.<\/p>\n
Sidy Mbaye, a 25-year-old Senegalese man repatriated in March, had entered Tunisia irregularly in 2021 and worked as a street vendor. He described abuses by police in Tunis:<\/p>\n
[On February 25,] I went into town to sell phones, T-shirts, and fabric in the market. \u2026 Three police officers came toward me and asked my nationality. They said, \u201cDid you hear what the president said? You have to get out …\u201d They did not ask me for \u2026 any documents. They took everything that I was selling … I [resisted] \u2026 They severely beat me, punching me and hitting me with batons. There was blood coming from my nose \u2026<\/p>\n
They\u2026took me to the police station \u2026 put me in a cell and continued to hit and insult me \u2026 They said something about me being Black … They still didn\u2019t ask me for documents. I spent one day there. I was refusing to leave because I wanted my property, but I finally left. They threatened me and said, \u201cIf you return and sell these things again, you will be killed. Leave the country immediately.\u201d \u2026 Where I lived with five other Senegalese, the [property] owner was a policeman \u2026 Coming back, we found our belongings outside.<\/p>\n
Papi Sakho, 29, a Senegalese man who came to Tunis irregularly to work, experienced violence and forced eviction by the police prior to his repatriation in March:<\/p>\n
At the end of February \u2026 five police officers came … There were four of us working at the carwash garage, me and two Gambians, one Ivorian. \u2026 They didn\u2019t ask for our papers. … They yelled at us, insulted us … They beat me severely with batons…. The Ivorian was injured and bleeding … They closed our garage … And we\u2019re the ones who usually washed their police cars!<\/p>\n
The police then took us to our apartment and warned the owner that we no longer had the right to stay.\u2026They grabbed our bags and put them outside \u2026 My passport got left behind. The police took my two phones … The others told me the police took some of their money.<\/p>\n
A Senegalese mechanic, Moussa Bald\u00e9, 30, said that he came to Tunisia in 2021 with a work visa. He traveled to Tunis in February 2023 to purchase car parts. \u201cA policeman stopped my taxi and made me get out, and he pushed me. He said, \u2018You are Black, you don\u2019t have the right to be here …\u2019 He didn\u2019t ask for my papers, just targeted me because of my skin color.\u201d At the police station, \u201cTwo police officers punched and hit me. They gave me food only once during the two days [of detention], and I slept on the ground.\u201d The police asked no questions about his legal status. \u201cThey said \u2026 \u2018We\u2019ll free you, but you need to leave the country.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
Abdoulaye Ba, 27, also from Senegal, had lived in Tunis since 2022. In February 2023, the police came to the construction site where he worked and arrested at least 10 people, documented and undocumented workers from West and Central Africa:<\/p>\n
There were Tunisians and Moroccans there, but they only arrested people with black skin. They asked which country we were from but didn\u2019t ask for our papers … We resisted arrest, and part of the town came out \u2026 throwing stones at us.\u2026 The police beat us with batons … They took us to a police station in Tunis and detained us for five hours, without asking to see our papers… Then they released us and told us to leave Tunisia. \u2026 The police also stole my iPhone 12, and others said the police took their money.<\/p>\n
A 24-year-old undocumented Malian said before his repatriation in March, he had worked at a restaurant in Tunis. In February, police arrested him as he returned from work with another Malian, but conducted no legal verification process. He said:<\/p>\n
They didn\u2019t ask for my papers \u2026 If they see a Black [person], they just take him and put him in their car. During the arrest, Tunisians were watching and yelling, \u201cYou Blacks need to leave \u2026\u201d Police took [my friend\u2019s] money \u2026 about 600 dinars … They kept us for four days [at a police station]. \u2026 We slept on the ground \u2026 They only gave us bread and water twice a day. … We found around 100 Africans [detained] there \u2026 They treated us as if we weren\u2019t human.<\/p>\n
A 24-year-old undocumented Cameroonian living in Sfax said that several times in early 2023, police raided the home he shared with several migrants and took their phones and cash.<\/p>\n
Police abuses were not limited to 2023. A 31-year-old Malian man said that in December 2021, a group of 6-8 police officers found him sleeping at a train station and assaulted him before arresting him for irregular entry, in a town near the Algerian border: \u201cThey hit me repeatedly with their batons, until I fell, and then they kicked me.\u201d<\/p>\n
A 32-year-old Malian, repatriated in March, said that police in Sfax took two of his phones in mid-2022, in addition to money his friend was carrying. \u201cPolicemen, when they see a Black person with a small bag, they will search it. When they find money [or valuables], they take it,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Police Crackdown on Refugee Protesters<\/p>\n
Following President Saied\u2019s speech, scores of refugees, asylum seekers, and others rendered homeless due to evictions, or otherwise in fear for their safety, camped in front of the UNHCR and IOM offices in Lac 1, Tunis. Some of those in front of UNHCR barricaded the area and began protesting. After several people forcibly entered part of UNHCR\u2019s premises, police arrived on April 11 to disperse the camp. The police used tear gas and force, and some people threw stones at cars or police.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe police response was a disproportionate use of violence \u2026 especially given the vulnerable people there, families and small children,\u201d said Elizia Volkmann, a journalist who arrived on the scene later that day. Human Rights Watch listened to an interview Volkmann recorded on April 11 with a witness to the events, who said he saw police slap a Sudanese woman before the situation escalated, and that police beat people with sticks and fired \u201cmany rounds of tear gas.\u201d<\/p>\n
A Sudanese asylum seeker, who had camped outside the UNHCR office since November 2022, told Human Rights Watch that he and others had barricaded the area for protection, and on April 10 had entered UNHCR premises \u201cto drink water and use the toilet.\u201d On April 11, he said, \u201cIt was the police who started the violence. They \u2026 came and fired [tear] gas at us. And that was the first time the police threw stones at us \u2013 I saw two of them do it.\u201d He said he then saw some people throw stones back at police. After he fled the area, he said, the police beat and arrested him and others in the street.<\/p>\n
The police initially took about 80 to 100 people into custody at Lac 1 police post, including some women and children, and left the camp destroyed. They released the Sudanese asylum seeker along with others later that day, but transferred 31 men to Mornaguia prison under various charges including disobedience and assault, according to a Lawyers Without Borders (ASF) representative. ASF provided legal assistance to the accused, who were released in late April, with charges later dismissed for half the group and the other half awaiting a September hearing, the representative said.<\/p>\n
A Sierra Leonean asylum seeker, who had camped outside IOM and UNHCR since his eviction from his apartment in February, was among those arrested. Human Rights Watch reviewed a government document confirming his release from Mornaguia prison in late April. During the April 11 camp crackdown, he \u201csaw one Liberian [asylum seeker] beaten by police \u2026 there was so much blood.\u201d He said he was not involved in violence but had recorded videos and made phone calls. He said police grabbed him, arrested him, and tortured him in detention:<\/p>\n
In the police van, one [officer] started choking me to force me to open my phone. \u2026They took me to the police station in Lac 1. They separated three of us, me and a Sierra Leonean [asylum seeker] and the [injured] Liberian \u2026<\/p>\n
[The police] put us in a private room, where they tortured us. [Two uniformed officers] used \u2026 a wooden stick \u2026 hitting us on our heads, ankles, places where your bones are \u2026 Two [other uniformed officers] gave us shocks with electronic devices like tasers \u2026 One [man in civilian clothes] \u2026said to me in English, \u201cYou are \u2026 saying Tunisia is not safe \u2026 You fucking immigrants and refugees, you want to spoil our image.\u201d\u2026 The other police were insulting us in Arabic … They tortured us \u2026 for around 45 minutes.<\/p>\n
A Sudanese refugee also told Human Rights Watch he was beaten and given electric shocks by police at the Lac 1 post before his transfer to Mornaguia prison.<\/p>\n
A Tunis resident, who helped several men get medical assistance after release from Mornaguia prison in May, said two refugees, an Eritreans and a Central African, had described police using conducted electrical weapons such tasers on them during their arrest. He also said two Eritrean refugees told him that at Lac 1 post, \u201cThe police beat them \u2026 out of sight of the camera.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Sudanese asylum seeker who was detained and released the same day said he saw several African detainees taken to another room at the station and heard them crying in pain, and later some told him the police had used devices to give them electric shocks. The police violence had convinced him to leave Tunisia, he said: \u201cI\u2019m asking some people I know to help me to cross the sea, to be far away from this country.\u201d<\/p>\n
Coast Guard Abuses and Sea Interceptions<\/p>\n
Of the six people Human Rights Watch interviewed who had attempted one or more boat journeys to Europe, five had experienced \u201cpullbacks\u201d – forced returns of outgoing boats, or other actions by authorities to prevent people from leaving a country outside of official border crossings. Pullbacks can violate individuals\u2019 rights to seek asylum and to leave any country, whether their own or another, trapping people in abusive situations.<\/p>\n
Five interviewees also described abuses by Tunisian authorities during or after sea interceptions (four) or rescues (one) near Sfax between 2019 and 2023.<\/p>\n
Salif Keita, a 28-year-old Malian repatriated in March, said he attempted a boat voyage in 2019, embarking from Sfax. \u201cThe national [coast] guard took our motor and left us stranded at sea,\u201d he said. \u201cWe had to break pieces of wood from the boat \u2026 to paddle ourselves back.\u201d<\/p>\n
An Ivorian man in Sfax attempted a sea journey in January 2022. He said the coast guard intercepted them and hit the passengers with sticks. While at sea, he said, he also saw a migrant boat whose passengers included children overturned by waves caused by a coast guard boat.<\/p>\n
A 32-year-old man from Mali had also attempted a sea journey. He had entered Tunisia regularly, but his entry stamp expired. Unable to obtain a residence permit, in December 2021 he embarked near Sfax in a boat with approximately 50 West and Central Africans. The authorities intercepted them within 15 minutes, he said: \u201cThey took peoples\u2019 money or phones … Those who didn\u2019t have either, they hit and insulted them. I even saw an [officer] hitting one of the women \u2026 They took my phone.\u201d<\/p>\n
A 24-year-old man from Cameroon said the coast guard rescued him and others after their boat overturned near Sfax in April 2023. Once on land, the officers insulted, spat on, and beat him and other survivors, before releasing them.<\/p>\n
Moussa Kamara, a 28-year-old Malian in Sfax, had entered Tunisia in May 2022. In December 2022, he embarked near Sfax in a boat with around 25 West Africans. \u201cAfter not even 30 minutes, the [coast] guard came [positioning their boat alongside ours] and said \u2018Stop!\u2019 We didn\u2019t stop, so one of the national guards started to hit people with a baton … they hit three men, including me \u2026 One of my friends was injured.\u201d The authorities took them to Sfax and released them.<\/p>\n
After this experience, Kamara remained in Tunisia, but Saied\u2019s speech and its aftermath changed his mind: \u201cI decided to try [a sea journey] again. The president said to leave the country. If I didn\u2019t leave, I wouldn\u2019t find a place to live or work.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe president created a climate of terror for migrants in Tunisia, so many are rushing to leave,\u201d said Ben Amor of the Tunisian Forum, FTDES. \u201cThese past few months, the coast guard started to use tear gas to force [boats] to stop \u2026 And they target migrants who try to film them \u2026 they confiscate the phones after each operation.\u201d<\/p>\n
An Alarm Phone volunteer in Tunis said her team had collected similar accounts: \u201cSince 2022, there is a pattern of behavior by Tunisian coast guards to try to attack the boats \u2026 using sticks to beat people, in some cases [using] tear gas \u2026 shooting in the air or toward the engine … sometimes \u2026 leaving people stranded [at sea in disabled boats].\u201d Many such practices were cited in a December statement by over 50 groups in Tunisia, and again in April.<\/p>\n
EU Migration Control Support<\/p>\n
Between 2015 and 2021, the EU allocated \u20ac93.5 million to Tunisia from its \u201cEmergency Trust Fund for Africa\u201d (EUTF), which sought to combat irregular migration, displacement, and instability. This included \u20ac37.6 million for \u201cborder management\u201d and efforts against \u201cmigrant smuggling and human trafficking.\u201d A February 2022 EU document said the counter-smuggling\/trafficking funding \u201cprovides for equipment and training for officers of the Internal Security Forces, as well as the Tunisian Customs.\u201d<\/p>\n
The same document said the EU would \u201cdesignate\u201d up to \u20ac85 million for migration-related projects in Tunisia in 2021-2022. It did not specify what had already been spent, though a February 2021 EU document stated, \u201cA very significant EU-funded support programme, benefiting the Tunisian Coast Guard, is currently being implemented.\u201d As much as \u20ac55 million of the \u20ac85 million could have been allocated to supporting migration control in Tunisia, based on the breakdown in the 2022 document: border management (\u20ac25m, including support to the coast guard); migration \u201cgovernance\u201d and protection (\u20ac6-10m); legal migration and labor mobility (\u20ac20-25m); combatting migrant smuggling\/trafficking (\u20ac12-20m); and returns (\u20ac5m).<\/p>\n
The 2022 document also details extensive bilateral support to Tunisia by Italy, Spain, France, Germany and other EU states. In addition to its \u201cfund for migration cooperation (ca. \u20ac10 million),\u201d Italy supplied equipment (vehicles, boats, and more) \u201cfor a total value of \u20ac138 million since 2011,\u201d and \u201ctechnical assistance related to border control (2017-2018) … for a total of \u20ac12 million,\u201d which included support to the Tunisian police and national guard. Germany also provided boats and vehicles, while Spain supplied IT equipment.<\/p>\n
The EU\u2019s 2021-2027 \u201cMulti-Country Migration Programme for the Southern Neighbourhood,\u201d which encompasses Tunisia, incorporates some positive elements \u2013 support to development of asylum policies, legal migration pathways, civil society engagement \u2013 but still highlights support to \u201claw enforcement action\u201d and \u201cborder and coast guard authorities\u201d for border control. Problematic project indicators conflate sea interceptions and rescues (\u201cnumber of migrants intercepted\/rescued through SAR operations at sea\u201d and \u201con land\u201d).<\/p>\n
European politicians have repeatedly proposed various migration partnerships with Tunisia, including offshore processing centers, \u201csafe third country\u201d deals, and agreements that could allow returns of third-country nationals who transited Tunisia.<\/p>\n
International law admits the possibility of safe third country designations, which enable receiving countries to transfer asylum seekers on the presumption that the country they travelled through, or some other country, can fairly examine their refugee claims and provide effective protection. UNHCR guidelines list conditions for such transfers, including respect for refugee and human rights law standards and \u201cprotection against threats to physical safety or freedom.\u201d The EU Asylum Procedures Directive requires non-EU member states to meet specific criteria to be designated \u201csafe,\u201d including \u201cno risk of serious harm.\u201d<\/p>\n
Given the documented abuses by security forces and xenophobic attacks against migrants, asylum seekers and refugees in Tunisia, in addition to Tunisia\u2019s lack of a national asylum law, it appears that Tunisia does not meet EU law criteria for a safe third country. Black Africans in particular should not be forcibly returned or transferred to Tunisia.<\/p>\n
Recommendations<\/p>\n
The European Parliament, in its negotiations with the EU Council on the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, should seek to limit the discretionary use of the \u201csafe third country\u201d concept by individual EU member states. EU institutions and member states should agree on clear criteria for designating a country a \u201csafe third country\u201d for purposes of returning or transferring third-country nationals, to ensure that EU member states do not erode protection criteria in their application of the concept, and determine publicly whether Tunisia meets these standards, taking into account the ongoing attacks and abuses against Black Africans in Tunisia.
\nThe EU and member states concerned should suspend funding and other support to Tunisian security forces for border\/migration control, and condition any future aid on verifiable human rights benchmarks.
\nThe Tunisian government should investigate all reported abuses against migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees by authorities or civilians; ensure accountability, including through appropriate legal action; and implement reforms and oversight systems within the police, national guard (including coast guard), and military to ensure respect for human rights, end racial discrimination or violence, and refrain from adding to racial hatred or discrimination against Black Africans.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Security Forces Abuse Migrants; EU Should Suspend Migration Control Support<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12963,"featured_media":31446,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,15],"tags":[7,26,25],"class_list":{"0":"post-31449","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"category-politics","9":"tag-apie-project","10":"tag-news","11":"tag-politics"},"yoast_head":"\n